E-ISSN 2231-170X | ISSN 2231-1696
 

Original Article 


Morphometric analysis of the cervical spine of Indian population by using computerized tomography

Partha Sarathi Banerjee, Amit Roychoudhury, Santanu Kumar Karmakar.

Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to measure the surgically important morphological parameters of cervical spine region of a representative sample of Indian population from the images obtained through computerized tomography (CT). Another purpose has been to compare the computed statistical mean, standard deviation and range of variation of these data with those of other Asian population and also European/American populations. With that aim, ninety five (95) CT scan data of Indian people (73 for male patients and 22 for female patients) pertaining to undeformed normal cervical spine has been collected from an Indian hospital. From these, 15 important morphological parameters have been measured. These values have been tabulated and their mean, standard deviation and range of variation have been computed. It has been found that pedicle dimensions of Indian people are smaller at almost all vertebra levels as compared to Caucasian people. Pedicle axis length for Indian people are found to be smaller at C3, C4 and C5 levels than those for other Asian people including Chinese people, but it is bigger at C6 and C7 levels. Indian people have longer measurements of pedicle length + lateral mass on an average than their other Asian counterparts at C5, C6 and C7 levels, but shorter measurements at C3 and C4 levels. The results of the present work may help in better understanding of morphological parameters of cervical spine region of Indian population. It may be further useful in designing spinal implants which would be biomechanically compatible to the anatomy of Indian people.

Key words: Anatomy, Cervical spine, Indian population, Morphological data, Pedicle, Vertebra


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Partha Sarathi Banerjee
Articles by Amit Roychoudhury
Articles by Santanu Kumar Karmakar
on Google
on Google Scholar

REFERENCES
1. Karaikovic EE, Daubs MD, Madsen RW, Gaines RW Jr: Morphologic characteristics of human cervical pedicle. Spine 1997; 22: 493-500. [DOI via Crossref]   
2. Van Eck PJ, Chaffin DB, Foust DR, Baum JK, Snyder RG: A bibliography of whiplash and cervical kinematic measurement. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, UM-HSRI-B1-73-6, 1973
3. White AA III and Panjabi MM. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, 1978.
4. Duray SM, Morter HB, Smith FJ. Morphological variation in cervical spinous processes: potential applications in the forensic identification of race from the skeleton. J Forensic Science 1999; 44(5):937–944. [DOI via Crossref]   
5. Yoganandan N, Knowles SA, Maiman DJ, Pintar FA. Anatomic study of the morphology of human cervical facet joint. Spine 2003; 28:2317. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
6. Kettler A, Werner K, Wilke HJ. Morphological changes of cervical facet joints in elderly individuals. Eur Spine J 2007; 16:987-92. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]    [PMC Free Fulltext]   
7. Kayalioglu G, Erturk M, Varol T, Cezayirli E. Morphometry of the cervical vertebral pedicles as a guide for transpedicular screw fixation. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2007; 47:102-108. [DOI via Crossref]   
8. Bozbuga M, Ozturk A, Ari Z, Sahinoglu K, Bayraktar B, Cecen A. Morphometric evaluation of subaxial cervical vertebrae for surgical application of transpedicular screw fixation. Spine 2004; 29:1876-1880. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
9. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Knight T, Yeasting RA. Morphometric evaluation of lower cervical pedicle and its projection. Spine 1997; 22:1-5. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
10. Jones EL, Heller JG, Silcox DH, Hutton WC. Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws: anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison. Spine 1997; 22:977-982. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
11. Panjabi MM, Duranceau J, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K. Cervical human vertebrae: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine 1991; 16:861-869. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
12. Panjabi MM, Shin EK, Chen NC, Wang JL. Internal morphology of human cervical pedicles. Spine 2000; 25:1197-1205. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
13. Ugur HC, Attar A, Uz A, Tekdemir I, Egemen N, Caglar S, Genc Y. Surgical anatomic evaluation of the cervical pedicle and adjacent neural structures. Neurosurgery 2000; 47:1162-1169. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
14. Stanescu S, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting R, Bailey AS, Jackson WT. Morphometric evaluation of the cervico-thoracic junction. Spine 1994; 19:2082-2088. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
15. Ruofu Z, Huilin Y, Xiaoyun H, Xishun H, Tiansi T, Liang C, Xigong L. CT evaluation of cervical pedicle in a Chinese population for surgical application of transpedicular screw placement. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2008; 30:389-396. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
16. Senoglu M, Ozbag D, Gumusalam Y. C-2 anterior plate-screw fixation: a quantitative anatomical and morphometric evaluation, Bratisl Lek Listy 2010; 111(10):566-569.
17. Schaffler MB, Alson MD, Heller JG, Garfin SR. Morphology of the dens. A quantitative study. Spine 1992; 17(7):738-743. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
18. Xu R, Nadaud MC, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA. Morphology of the second cervical vertebra and the posterior projection of the C2 pedicle axis. Spine 1995; 20(3):259-263. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
19. Naderi S, Arman C, Guvencer M, et al. Morphometric Analysis of the C2 Body and the Odontoid Process. Turkish Neurosurgery 2006; 16(1):14-18.
20. Liu J, Napolitano JT, Ebraheim NA. Systematic review of cervical pedicle dimensions and projections. Spine 2010; 35(24):E1373-E1380. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
21. Singh R, Srivastva SK, Prasath CS, Rohilla RK, Siwach R, Magu NK. Morphometric measurements of cadaveric thoracic spine in Indian population and its clinical applications. Asian Spine J 2011; 5(1):20-34. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]    [PMC Free Fulltext]   
22. Xu R, Kang A, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA. Anatomic relation between the cervical pedicle and the adjacent neural structures. Spine 1999; 24:451-454. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   

How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Partha Sarathi Banerjee, Amit Roychoudhury, Santanu Kumar Karmakar. Morphometric analysis of the cervical spine of Indian population by using computerized tomography. J Med Allied Sci. 2012; 2(2): 66-76.


Web Style

Partha Sarathi Banerjee, Amit Roychoudhury, Santanu Kumar Karmakar. Morphometric analysis of the cervical spine of Indian population by using computerized tomography. https://jmas.in/?mno=210674 [Access: January 12, 2023].


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Partha Sarathi Banerjee, Amit Roychoudhury, Santanu Kumar Karmakar. Morphometric analysis of the cervical spine of Indian population by using computerized tomography. J Med Allied Sci. 2012; 2(2): 66-76.



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Partha Sarathi Banerjee, Amit Roychoudhury, Santanu Kumar Karmakar. Morphometric analysis of the cervical spine of Indian population by using computerized tomography. J Med Allied Sci. (2012), [cited January 12, 2023]; 2(2): 66-76.



Harvard Style

Partha Sarathi Banerjee, Amit Roychoudhury, Santanu Kumar Karmakar (2012) Morphometric analysis of the cervical spine of Indian population by using computerized tomography. J Med Allied Sci, 2 (2), 66-76.



Turabian Style

Partha Sarathi Banerjee, Amit Roychoudhury, Santanu Kumar Karmakar. 2012. Morphometric analysis of the cervical spine of Indian population by using computerized tomography. Journal of Medical and Allied Sciences, 2 (2), 66-76.



Chicago Style

Partha Sarathi Banerjee, Amit Roychoudhury, Santanu Kumar Karmakar. "Morphometric analysis of the cervical spine of Indian population by using computerized tomography." Journal of Medical and Allied Sciences 2 (2012), 66-76.



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Partha Sarathi Banerjee, Amit Roychoudhury, Santanu Kumar Karmakar. "Morphometric analysis of the cervical spine of Indian population by using computerized tomography." Journal of Medical and Allied Sciences 2.2 (2012), 66-76. Print.



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Partha Sarathi Banerjee, Amit Roychoudhury, Santanu Kumar Karmakar (2012) Morphometric analysis of the cervical spine of Indian population by using computerized tomography. Journal of Medical and Allied Sciences, 2 (2), 66-76.