E-ISSN 2231-170X | ISSN 2231-1696
 

Original Article 


Comparison of conventional diagnostic modalities, BACTEC culture with polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis

Mohammed Abdul Mohi Siddiqui, P. R. Anuradha, K. Nagamani, P. H. Vishnu.

Abstract
This study attempts to determine and compare the sensitivity, specificity and turnaround time of conventional diagnostic modalities, BACTEC culture and polymerase chain reaction test for diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. One hundred clinically suspected patients of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis were studied. Specimens from these patients were processed for Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) stain and culture for M. tuberculosis was done with inoculation on Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium as well as the BACTEC MGIT 960 TB system. All the samples were processed for PCR amplification with primers targeting 123 bp fragment of insertion element IS6110 sequence of M. tuberculosis complex. Out of the hundred extra-pulmonary samples processed, 5% were positive by ZN staining, 15% were positive by both LJ culture and BACTEC MGIT 960 TB culture and 70% were positive by PCR. Those samples positive by ZN smear, LJ culture and BACTEC culture were all found to be 100% positive by PCR. The mean detection time for M. tuberculosis was 23.13 days by LJ Medium culture, 9.86 days by BACTEC MGIT 960 TB culture and less than one day by PCR. PCR as a diagnostic tool is more sensitive and useful in diagnosis of extra-pulmonary form of tuberculosis when compared to conventional methods or BACTEC culture by definitely shortening the time with early initiation of anti-tubercular treatment and can prevent disease progressing towards irreversible tissue damage.

Key words: BACTEC MGIT 960 TB system, Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis, IS6110 sequence, LJ Medium, PCR, ZN staining


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Mohammed Abdul Mohi Siddiqui
Articles by P. R. Anuradha
Articles by K. Nagamani
Articles by P. H. Vishnu
on Google
on Google Scholar

REFERENCES
1. Sharma SK and Mohan A. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res. 2004; 120:316-353. [Pubmed]   
2. Golden MP and Vikram HR. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: An overview. Am Fam Physician 2005; 72:1761-1768. [Pubmed]   
3. Sekar B, Selvaraj L, Alexis A, et al.The utility of IS6110 sequence based Polymerase Chain Reaction in comparison to conventional methods in the diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Microbiol.2008; 26(4):352-355. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
4. Negi SS, Khan SFB, Gupta S, et al. Comparison of the conventional diagnostic modalities, BACTEC culture and polymerase chain reaction test for diagnosis of tuberculosis. Indian J Med Microbiol 2005; 23(1):29-33. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
5. Winn W Jr, Allen S, Janda W, Koneman E, et al. Mycobacteria. In: Koneman's Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. Chapter 19, 6th ed., Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; pp. 1064-1124, 2005.
6. Becton Dickinson Diagnostics. Mycobacterial Testing Systems [Internet]. New Jersey: BD; [date unknown]. Available from URL: http://www.bd.com/mycobacteriatesting
7. HAIN life science. Sonication procedure from Hains manual for DNA extraction [Internet]. Nehren: Hain lifescience Gmbh; [date unknown]. Available from URL : http://www.hain-lifescience.com
8. Ilgazli A, Boyaci H, Basyigit I, et al. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: clinical and epidemiologic spectrum of 636 cases. Arch Med Res. 2004; 35(5):435-441. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
9. Rodrigues CS, Shenai SV, Almeida DVG, et al. Use of Bactec 460 TB system in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2007; 25(1):32-36. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
10. Castro CM, Puerto GM, Mejia G, Garzon MC, Ribon W. Contribution of conventional methods and PCR to the diagnosis of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis. Rev Salud Publica. 2010; 12(2):42-52.
11. Rishi S, Sinha P, Malhotra B, et al. A comparative study for the detection of Mycobacteria byBACTEC MGIT 960, Lowenstein Jensen Media and direct AFB smear examination. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2007; 25(4):383-386. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
12. Negi SS, Anand R, Pasha ST, et al. Diagnostic potential of IS6110, 38kDa, 65kDa and 85B sequence-based polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2007; 25(1):43-49. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
13. Chawla K, Gupta S, Mukhopadhyay C, et al. PCR for M. tuberculosis in tissue samples. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2009; 3(2):83-87. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
14. Kesarwani RC, Pandey A, Misra A, et al. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR): Its comparison with conventional techniques for diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tubercular diseases. Indian J Surg. 2004; 66(2):84-88.
15. Hajia M, Rahbar M, Amini R. Is PCR assay reliable for diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis? Afr J Microbiol Res. 2009; 3(12):877-881.

How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Mohammed Abdul Mohi Siddiqui, P. R. Anuradha, K. Nagamani, P. H. Vishnu. Comparison of conventional diagnostic modalities, BACTEC culture with polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. J Med Allied Sci. 2013; 3(2): 53-58.


Web Style

Mohammed Abdul Mohi Siddiqui, P. R. Anuradha, K. Nagamani, P. H. Vishnu. Comparison of conventional diagnostic modalities, BACTEC culture with polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. https://jmas.in/?mno=211115 [Access: January 12, 2023].


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Mohammed Abdul Mohi Siddiqui, P. R. Anuradha, K. Nagamani, P. H. Vishnu. Comparison of conventional diagnostic modalities, BACTEC culture with polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. J Med Allied Sci. 2013; 3(2): 53-58.



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Mohammed Abdul Mohi Siddiqui, P. R. Anuradha, K. Nagamani, P. H. Vishnu. Comparison of conventional diagnostic modalities, BACTEC culture with polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. J Med Allied Sci. (2013), [cited January 12, 2023]; 3(2): 53-58.



Harvard Style

Mohammed Abdul Mohi Siddiqui, P. R. Anuradha, K. Nagamani, P. H. Vishnu (2013) Comparison of conventional diagnostic modalities, BACTEC culture with polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. J Med Allied Sci, 3 (2), 53-58.



Turabian Style

Mohammed Abdul Mohi Siddiqui, P. R. Anuradha, K. Nagamani, P. H. Vishnu. 2013. Comparison of conventional diagnostic modalities, BACTEC culture with polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. Journal of Medical and Allied Sciences, 3 (2), 53-58.



Chicago Style

Mohammed Abdul Mohi Siddiqui, P. R. Anuradha, K. Nagamani, P. H. Vishnu. "Comparison of conventional diagnostic modalities, BACTEC culture with polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis." Journal of Medical and Allied Sciences 3 (2013), 53-58.



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Mohammed Abdul Mohi Siddiqui, P. R. Anuradha, K. Nagamani, P. H. Vishnu. "Comparison of conventional diagnostic modalities, BACTEC culture with polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis." Journal of Medical and Allied Sciences 3.2 (2013), 53-58. Print.



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Mohammed Abdul Mohi Siddiqui, P. R. Anuradha, K. Nagamani, P. H. Vishnu (2013) Comparison of conventional diagnostic modalities, BACTEC culture with polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. Journal of Medical and Allied Sciences, 3 (2), 53-58.